vía ONLINE GAME |.
-
Entradas recientes
Comentarios recientes
salvolomas en Proponemos Más Metrobús para e… salvolomas en Bajar velocidad en nuestras ca… Marcel en Bajar velocidad en nuestras ca… salvolomas en "El Peaton" cuento c… tomas en "El Peaton" cuento c… Categorías
- Accesibilidad
- Acera
- Agua
- Areas Verdes y Naturales
- Automóvil
- Bicicleta
- Buses
- Calles
- Caminabilidad
- Caminabilidad
- CDMX
- Ciudad
- Codigos
- Comercio
- Competitividad
- Comunicacion
- Conagua
- Contaminacion Ambiental
- Cultura
- Densidad y Productividad
- Derechos Humanos
- Desarrollo Urbano
- Dispersion Urbana
- Economia
- Edificios
- Editoriales
- Espacio Publico
- Estacionamiento
- Filosofia
- Habitabilidad
- Integracion social
- Medio Ambiente
- Metro o Tren Ligero
- Mezcla de Usos
- Movilidad
- Participación Ciudadana
- Peaton
- Planeacion Urbana
- Planificacion Urbana
- Politicas Publicas
- Responsabilidad Social
- Seguridad
- Tecnologia Digital
- Trafico
- Transporte
- Transporte sostenible
- TransportePublico
- Uncategorized
- Urbanismo
- Uso de Suelo
- Vivienda
Meta
Califica mi blog vecinal sobre urbanismo
Blogroll
- Urban Kchoze
- Streetblog
- World Streets
- CityLab Latino en español
- El Caso contra los Coches
- A Pie
- The Plaza Perspective
- Get Support
- Get Inspired
- NarrowStreets SF
- Equality Streets
- Learn WordPress.com
- "La Ciudad es para la Gente" – ultimo libro de Jan Gehl
- Get Polling
- Small Streets
- Discuss
- JaneJacobsJapan
- Pontevedra ciudad para los niños
- The Original Green Blog
- La Ciudad Viva
Archivos
Actualizaciones de Twitter
- RT @yoly_olvera: @MaxKaiser75 Mucha emoción al escuchar su himno, así será cuando escuchemos el himno mexicano y saquemos a quien nos esta… 3 days ago
- RT @VigiaYucateco: @MaxKaiser75 @donatoarellano A pesar de ser vecinos de frontera, México está a una gran distancia de los Estados Unidos.… 3 days ago
- RT @rofmendez_rod: @MaxKaiser75 El voto democrático lo llevó a la Casa Blanca, este mismo lo despidió. El 6 de junio, demos el primer paso… 3 days ago
- RT @bereaguilarv: @MaxKaiser75 Estoy profundamente conmovida. Tengo un nudo pero es de esperanza. Nosotros habremos de ver el fin de un gob… 3 days ago
- RT @MaxKaiser75: Adiós al primer populista autoritario del continente, por la vía democrática! Nos faltan varios! 🖕🏼 https://t.co/966zCpCjkh 3 days ago
23 Responses to ONLINE GAME
This is a great project!
Mary’s last goal doesn’t make sense: What sort of HOA President wouldn’t want to live next to a park?!?
That’s a good point! But this particular HOA President has lived in the neighborhood a long time, is nervous about change and uncomfortable with the new diversity of Solano Heights. She sees parks as possible gathering places for “trouble-makers” — like gangs and drugs and vandals (folks that others might recognize simply as “kids” and “teenagers”). So she doesn’t want to live next to a park…
If you could relocate the park like you can with the factory, this game would be much easier to make everyone happy with.
Also, Consuelo’s demand for *14* A-housing units is ridiculous, but could be achieved more easily if the A-housing also counted as height-controlled.
Food for thought…
Game is accurate. In my seven year planning parks I cam to realize that everyone wants a park and no one wants it next door – unless is restricted to the immediate residents. It seems our belief in private property and history of suburbanization of all elements of our environment has left us unable to value and use well public spaces. Many homeowners believe that only the morally dubious (druggies, prostitutes, apartment dwellers, teenagers, and homeless) have need for or would use public spaces. The good folk would obviously use their spacious yards, community clubs, carbon fiber bicycles, fitness clubs, or at the very least trader joe’s, to recreate.
Appreciate your comment — hopefully we can help generate some conversations that lead to alternative scenarios…
You’re, of course, welcome and free to create creative and entertaining games like this one. I’m offended, however, that you apparently use government funds to help pay for it. Your game is based on a pure collectivist perspective without mention of other view points. I believe this method of land-use planning minimizes low-cost housing and business resources. Although certainly not perfect, there were fewer major problems before group-zoning was strictly enforced.
Please consider the ethics of accepting funding from an organization (the Feds) that is increasing our debt to pay for such programs.
Thanks for your comment. And please be assured that very little funds of any kind, government or otherwise, went into this small experiment.
Jim, calm down. It’s the Fed’s job to ration the soup and close the door when it runs out, not our job to yell at the hobos to stop standing in line ….
(I couldn’t think of a good car analogy).
Nice little game. I do wish there was an additional level where you had access to all of the zoning possibilities, and the goal of ‘Make everyone happy’. I was kinda disappointed that in my playthrough I never had the chance to resolve the conflict about the park, and that doing another playthrough aiming for that would lock out one of the other conflict resolutions instead.
… The same Everett Mann from http://www.scp-wiki.net/dr-manns-personnel-file ?
No! Our Everett Mann is a completely fictitious real estate developer. (but yours is interesting).
Interesting choice that you can’t win the game and make the single family home owner happy.
Its a Single family home in a dense city area, next to an apartment building. They will never be happy. And if you look at the icon for her she is elderly, part of the last generation and has lived in that house for a long time. An apartment building is always changing its something that bothers that person. I would say.
I won the game and still made the home owner happy. I was trying to test myself. You just have to pick a different goal – the village – instead of sustainability or balance.
good job!
After attempting to learn about Relocation Benefits, I get this message:http://i.imgur.com/9W7Ye3o.png
Thanks, Jack! We will correct that. (We’re still ironing out the nits)