Los Rascacielos No Causan Trafico; Los Estacionamientos Si

vía High-Rises Don’t Cause Traffic; Parking Lots Do | Streetsblog.net.

High-Rises Don’t Cause Traffic; Parking Lots Do

Traffic is worse than it used to be in Austin, but you can't blame rising density, via Car Free Austin.

Pocas cosas evocan la histeria del cataclismo a causa del auto como la construccion de torres altas de vivienda. Mientras en Austin se ve mayor crecimiento, algunos han agarrado esto como causa de los problemas de trafico de la region.

Pero la densida de vivienda NO es la causa del trafico congestionado, dice Carrie Gammell at Car Free Austin:

It seems that local media outlets constantly bemoan the statistic that 110 people move to Austin on an average dayTall buildings, skyscrapers, 10-to-50-story buildings full of people are presumably to blame. Meanwhile, the city is still not as dense as it was in 1950, 1960, 1970, or 1980.

In fact, 2015 Austin is only 68% as dense as 1950 Austin.

1950 Austin had no towers. An aerial photograph of the city shows a downtown almost entirely covered with trees and buildings, the tallest of which was the Texas State Capitol.

1950 Austin had no I-35. Residents traversed the city in buses manned by Austin Transit Corporation, Greyhound Lines, and Continental Trailways.

On the other hand, 2010 Austin had eighteen towers taller than the Texas State Capitol. It had I-35, Loop 1, SH-71, and US 183. While it may appear that our present-day city is more crowded and the traffic less manageable, that feeling of encroachment is most certainly due not to an increase in people but to an increase in cars, an increase in asphalt. Over time blocks of historic houses were destroyed to make way for expressway feeders. Parks and greenbelts were devastated to make way for commuters’ vehicular storage. Previous generations literally “paved paradise and put up a parking lot.”

Elsewhere on the Network today: Better Institutions says transit in Seattle is held hostage to state highway-building interests. Transport Providence has ideas on how to improve RIPTA’s No. 1 bus route. And City Beautiful 21 says it’s important to understand the concept of “filtering” in discussions on affordable housing.

Acerca de salvolomas

Asociación vecinal, formada con objeto de preservar la colonia habitacional unifamiliar preponderantemente, con calles de trafico calmado, seguras para la bici, parques, banquetas adecuadas para ir caminando a centros de barrio con comercios y servicios y oficinas solo en áreas designadas.
Esta entrada fue publicada en Calles, Densidad y Productividad, Edificios, Estacionamiento, Habitabilidad, Movilidad, Trafico y etiquetada , . Guarda el enlace permanente.

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s